The best CPG executives I place are almost never looking for a job. They're already running a function at a brand you've heard of, doing fine, not browsing postings at midnight. So when your job description lands in front of one of them, it has about ten seconds to make them lean in or scroll past. Most descriptions blow it.
I read a lot of executive job descriptions. Founders send them to me at the start of a search, and a good portion of them are doing the opposite of what they're meant to do. They're written to protect the company, not to attract a leader. They list duties no A-player cares about and bury the three things that would actually make a great candidate pay attention.
Here's how to write one that works, and what to cut today.
Why Most CPG Job Descriptions Repel A-Players
The typical executive job description is a committee document. Someone pulls last year's version, every stakeholder adds the bullets that matter to them, and nobody removes anything. You end up with a two-page wall of responsibilities and a requirements list so long it reads like a wish for a person who does not exist.
A weak candidate reads that and applies anyway. A strong candidate reads it and thinks, "this company doesn't actually know what it wants." Then they close the tab. You've filtered for exactly the wrong person.
Your job description isn't a legal contract or a duties checklist. For the candidate you most want, it's a sales document. Treat it like one.
Lead With Outcomes, Not Responsibilities
This is the single biggest fix, and it costs nothing. Instead of opening with "responsibilities include," open with what this person needs to have accomplished by the end of their first year.
Compare these two lines for a VP of Sales. Responsibilities version: "Manage the national sales team and oversee key account relationships." Outcomes version: "In your first year, you'll take us from three regional retailers to a national footprint, and rebuild the broker network that gets us there." One of those makes a great salesperson lean in. The other could describe a thousand jobs.
Write the first-year scorecard before you write the post
I tell every founder the same thing: define the 30, 60, and 90 day outcomes before you write a single bullet. If you can't articulate what success looks like in concrete terms, no job description will save the search, because you won't be able to tell a great candidate from a plausible one. This is the same discipline that separates a good hire from an expensive mistake, which I wrote about in the real cost of a bad VP hire.
Name the hard parts
A-players are drawn to real problems. If the supply chain is held together with duct tape, or you're entering a category you've never sold into, say so. The candidate you want reads that as a challenge worth taking. The candidate you don't want reads it as a reason to keep scrolling. That's the filter working in your favor.
Put the Money on the Table
If you take one thing from this post, take this: publish a real salary range. Not "competitive." Not "commensurate with experience." A number.
The data here is no longer debatable. SHRM research found that 82 percent of U.S. workers are more likely to apply to a job when the pay range is listed, and 66 percent of organizations that posted ranges saw an increase in the quality of their applicants, not just the volume. Roughly three in four candidates say they're less interested in a posting with no range at all.
At the executive level this matters even more, because the cost of getting deep into a process and discovering a $60,000 gap is enormous, for both sides. A published range does your screening for you. It tells the right candidates the role is real and respects their time, and it quietly moves the mismatched ones along before anyone wastes a phone call. If you're not sure what the right range is for a senior F&B or CPG role, our executive compensation calculator is a good place to pressure-test it.
Write Like a Human, Not a Committee
Senior candidates skim. They scan for the mission, the scope, the money, and the stage of the business, and they decide in seconds whether to keep reading. So put the important things near the top and cut everything that isn't doing work.
Watch the tone, too. There's a long-running debate about gendered wording in job ads, and the honest answer is that the effect is smaller than the early studies claimed. More recent MIT Sloan research found that swapping a few "masculine-coded" words for neutral ones doesn't move applicant behavior much on its own. The lesson isn't to ignore language, it's that you can't word-swap your way to a better candidate pool. What actually works is being clear, specific, and human, and backing the posting with a role that's genuinely good.
Trim the requirements list to what predicts success
A long must-have list screens out strong candidates, who tend to disqualify themselves unless they hit nearly every bullet, while doing almost nothing to deter weak ones. Separate the five to eight true must-haves from the nice-to-haves, and be ruthless about which is which. "P&L ownership at a scaling CPG brand" is a must-have. "MBA preferred" almost never is.
Sell the Mission and the Upside
The executives worth hiring are not making a move for a marginally better title. They're making a move for a bigger problem, a clearer mandate, and meaningful upside. Your description should speak to all three.
This tracks with what the broader market is telling us. LinkedIn's Future of Recruiting research consistently finds that senior candidates weigh mission alignment, challenging work, and growth opportunity alongside pay, not after it. For a food and beverage brand, that's an advantage you should use. You're not selling a spreadsheet job. You're selling a chance to build a category, put a product on shelves people actually love, and own equity in something that could be big.
Say that part out loud. Two or three honest sentences about where the brand is headed and why the role matters will outperform a paragraph of corporate boilerplate every time. If you want to see how we frame the F&B and CPG opportunity for candidates, take a look at our industry page.
Five Things to Cut Today
If you want a faster fix than rewriting from scratch, open your current description and delete these:
1. "Rockstar," "ninja," "wizard," and "guru"
No serious operator with twenty years of experience wants to be called a rockstar. It reads as a company that doesn't take the role seriously.
2. The 15-bullet responsibilities list
Replace it with three to five first-year outcomes. If a duty doesn't ladder up to an outcome, it doesn't belong in the post.
3. "Competitive salary"
Replace with a real range. See above.
4. "Other duties as assigned"
It tells an A-player nothing except that you couldn't be bothered to define the job.
5. The mission statement that could belong to any company
If you could swap your brand's name out for a competitor's and the sentence still works, cut it. Say something only your company could say.
The Bottom Line
A great job description won't fix a search on its own. But a bad one quietly kills it before it starts, because the people you most want to reach are the quickest to walk away. Lead with outcomes. Put the money on the table. Sell the mission. Cut the filler. Write like a person who actually understands the job, because the candidate you want can tell the difference in seconds.
If you'd rather not write it alone, this is exactly the work we do at the front of every search, turning a vague need into a role definition that attracts the right people. Here's how our process runs, and here's how to start a search when you're ready.
Hiring a leader in CPG or F&B this year?
We run retained executive searches at a flat fee, with a real-time client portal, written candidate evaluations, and a 90-day hiring guarantee on every search. We'll help you define the role before we ever open it.
